Slot's Four-Point Plan: Why Liverpool Should Ditch the Wingers and Reshape Their Midfield

The Bruno Debate: Seven Better No.10s Than Fernandes
The mailbox has been positively ablaze following claims that Bruno Fernandes represents the pinnacle of Premier League No.10 play. Several correspondents have taken issue with this assessment, and fairly so.
One writer points to a stellar cast of historical alternatives: Eric Cantona dragged his side to dominance whilst playing twice weekly; Paul Scholes evolved into the role before transitioning deeper; Wayne Rooney accumulated silverware galore; Teddy Sheringham made an instant impact; and Juan Mata delivered excellent service from Chelsea's blueprint.
Beyond Old Trafford, the counter-arguments flow thick: Peter Beardsley, Dennis Bergkamp (cited as the GOAT by one Spurs-supporting correspondent), David Silva, Kevin De Bruyne and Matt Le Tissier all merit consideration above the Manchester United captain.
The consensus? Fernandes undoubtedly possesses elite playmaking credentials—his chance creation metrics are genuinely elite. Yet he enjoyed one peculiar season where United faced minimal European distractions. Rooney, Bergkamp and De Bruyne offer equally compelling claims depending on your criteria. Perhaps the entire exercise proves pointless.
Liverpool's Structural Crisis Demands Radical Surgery
A Liverpool supporter has crystallised the club's fundamental problem through painful experience: balance. Not squad depth. Not individual quality. Balance.
The Reds stockpiled attacking midfielders and pacy full-backs whilst neglecting defensive solidity. They've assembled over £300 million in new attacking talent—Isak, Ekitike, Szoboszlai and Wirtz—yet cannot accommodate them within a functional system. Last summer's transfer business screams of disjointed planning: £200 million on two strikers when only one starts, £116 million on Wirtz to fill a position where Szoboszlai already flourishes.
Ryan Gravenberch epitomises the problem. Brilliant at beating the press during Slot's opening six months, opponents swiftly adapted by closing space rather than committing bodies. This removed his primary asset—his dribbling prowess—and exposed his passing limitations. Alexander-Arnold previously provided escape valve; his 2025-26 replacements offered neither passing range nor defensive security.
The midfield pairing of Szoboszlai and Wirtz presents an impossible headache. Both naturally gravitate toward No.10 roles. Both excel in the final third. Both struggle deeper. Neither possesses the defensive nous to shield a backline. Szoboszlai offers superior versatility, yet deploying your best player as a makeshift right-back represents catastrophic misallocation. Rotating them guarantees insufficient minutes for either and, inevitably, a disgruntled departure.
The remaining central options—Jones, MacAllister, Elliott—lean attacking. MacAllister possesses defensive awareness but lacks the athleticism modern football demands. Elliott proves completely unsuitable for an eight role. Endo simply doesn't meet the technical threshold anymore.
Then there's the forward line. Two strikers. Not versatile forwards. Strikers. Ekitike and Isak cannot operate wide due to insufficient defensive attributes and stamina. Gakpo presents a broken shell of himself. Chiesa offers nothing. A 17-year-old prospect shouldn't shoulder first-team expectations.
The Wrong Solution
Liverpool's hierarchy apparently plans to throw serious money at pacy wingers. Diomande, the media favourite, likely demands north of £80 million for one season's evidence at a lower level. He's right-footed and unproven in the Premier League's intensity. Another winger to replace the struggling Gakpo will follow. Possibly a backup left-back. More additions, more expenditure.
This addresses the wrong problem entirely.
The Alternative: Formation Revolution
Instead of buying wingers, switch formation. Abandon 4-2-3-1. Adopt 3-5-2 or 3-4-2-1. Buy one centre-back. Solve multiple problems simultaneously.
The elegance lies in simplicity. Three centre-backs provide defensive ballast. Your undersized full-backs transform into wing-backs—width specialists operating at their natural intensity. Five central positions emerge for your abundance of central talent. Gravenberch operates as a No.6 with genuine defensive shelter behind him. Two No.10s—Szoboszlai and Wirtz—flourish in their natural habitat, finally. Two strikers or one striker with MacAllister/Jones providing deeper cover.
This formation stabilises everything. It balances attack and defence. It accommodates your expensively-assembled midfielders. It costs one centre-back—perhaps Van de Ven as a realistic target—rather than £80 million-plus gambles on unproven wingers.
The current squad becomes functional. Ekitike gets minutes upon return. Chiesa and Gakpo cover the forward line adequately until then. Wirtz and Szoboszlai finally play together. Everyone gets meaningful opportunities. Creativity flourishes. Solidity returns.
Yet this requires managerial conviction Slot seemingly lacks. Formation changes represent philosophical surrenders. The fanbase resists them instinctively. So instead, expect expensive winger recruitment, continued imbalance, mounting frustration and a November exit.
Bruno, Concerts and Hypocrisy
The mailbox also tackled Bruno Fernandes' claim to greatness through historical comparison, World Cup ticket pricing in the United States, fixture scheduling chaos, and Jordan Henderson's controversial Saudi move.
On Henderson specifically: players may sign where they wish, but criticism remains entirely justified when those same individuals previously championed social causes whilst accepting millions from authoritarian regimes. Hypocrisy demands calling out.
One correspondent noted the FA's spectacular failure to honour commitments to match-going supporters. Record European participation from English clubs demands better fixture scheduling—Thursday-playing teams shouldn't face Sunday fixtures forcing midweek travel, Friday night matches require geographical consideration, and television announcements must arrive sufficiently early. Don't hold your breath.
Finally, one writer challenged Johnny Nic's recent article suggesting financial dominance ruins competitive balance. Hasn't football proven utterly unbalanced for three decades? Villa's gap with City dwarfs their gap with Freiburg. Burnley's chasm with the Sky Six exceeds the Bundesliga disparity. Yet we rarely discuss domestic inequality with the same vigour. Perhaps perspective matters.
Compare options


