Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Ronaldo's Al-Nassr Mutiny Deepens as Second Game Looms; Exit Threat Emerges for Summer

February 3, 2026
Ronaldo's Al-Nassr Mutiny Deepens as Second Game Looms; Exit Threat Emerges for Summer
Ronaldo's Al-Nassr Mutiny Deepens as Second Game Looms; Exit Threat Emerges for Summer

Cristiano Ronaldo's grievances with Al-Nassr show no signs of cooling, with the Portugal legend now poised to miss his second consecutive Saudi Pro League outing as his protest against the club's transfer strategy intensifies.

Having already withdrawn from Monday's victory over Al Riyadh, Ronaldo appears set to skip Friday's clash with Al Ittihad as his stand-off with the club's hierarchy continues. The 39-year-old's frustrations centre on what he perceives as a lack of ambition in the transfer market and the Saudi Public Investment Fund's preferential treatment of rival clubs.

The crux of his complaint involves Al-Hilal's ability to secure marquee signings—notably Karim Benzema and other high-profile acquisitions—while Al-Nassr have managed only to bring in 21-year-old Iraqi centre-back Hayer Abdulkareem this winter window. Journalist Ben Jacobs outlined the complexity of Ronaldo's position on talkSPORT, suggesting the dispute encompasses both Benzema's move to Al Hilal specifically and broader concerns about how PIF allocates central funding across the Saudi Pro League.

"Cristiano Ronaldo is upset with the PIF strategy in particular," Jacobs explained. "Some in Saudi allege that Ronaldo didn't want Karim Benzema, former teammate, to go to Al Hilal. And instead felt it would be better for Saudi football for him to stay at Al Ittihad, or even join Al Nassr."

The journalist further noted that Al-Nassr supporters have voiced their own protests, questioning why Al Hilal received substantially more capital ahead of the Club World Cup whilst Al-Nassr's allocation proved considerably tighter. Jacobs added: "Whether it's Benzema specific, or whether there is a broader disagreement over strategy and ultimately funding, Ronaldo hasn't been backed. He's expected to be fined, he's likely to be punished for not making himself available for selection."

Recent upheaval within Al-Nassr's management structure has compounded matters. Portuguese officials Simão Coutinho (sporting director) and José Semedo (CEO) were suspended by the PIF, a move that has rankled Ronaldo and prevented high-calibre reinforcements from arriving under manager Jorge Jesus. Simultaneously, the club imposed significant cost reductions.

Behind closed doors, Ronaldo has made his conditions for return abundantly clear: Al-Nassr's management must swiftly restore their executive authority, and the PIF must cease its interference in the club's transfer operations, particularly during the mid-year window.

Yet despite overtures from European clubs and Major League Soccer sides, Ronaldo has determined that a mid-season departure would undermine his preparations for the World Cup. His solution? A summer exit. The former Manchester United and Real Madrid icon has threatened to depart in June and reportedly possesses a €50m release clause—one some outlets claim he would personally finance.

Former Liverpool midfielder Danny Murphy delivered a scathing assessment of Ronaldo's industrial action, labelling it "self-indulgent nonsense." Murphy suggested on talkSPORT that Ronaldo could dip into his considerable earnings to bolster the club's resources rather than holding it hostage.

"Maybe Ronaldo could give some of his earnings to the club to then help them get more players. I've never heard of something so ridiculous in all my life," Murphy said. He went on to describe the situation as "absolutely bizarre" given the earning capacity of both Ronaldo and Benzema, adding: "For either of them to be disillusioned, upset about the way their clubs are run, to put it mildly, is almost unthinkable."

Compare options